SPIRIT
Модератор: The Sonic God
- The Dishwasher
- leader
- Сообщения: 644
- Зарегистрирован: 13 авг 2003, 01:16
- Откуда: От верблюда :)
They made a transition?
IMNHO, CG has a little bit greater specter than handwriting, which has its own charm as well. As evolution has no pause button and CG provides a surprisingly easy way of rendering virtually perfect physical models, I do not seem to believe that handwriting would any more have the power it once had... That is another point that TLK scores against other animations...
Perfection cannot be perfect itself without having a bit of non-perfection.
IMNHO, CG has a little bit greater specter than handwriting, which has its own charm as well. As evolution has no pause button and CG provides a surprisingly easy way of rendering virtually perfect physical models, I do not seem to believe that handwriting would any more have the power it once had... That is another point that TLK scores against other animations...
Perfection cannot be perfect itself without having a bit of non-perfection.

- The Dishwasher
- leader
- Сообщения: 644
- Зарегистрирован: 13 авг 2003, 01:16
- Откуда: От верблюда :)
Shadowfox: Sorry, let me clarify, I meant that Spirit used both hand drawn and CG techniques, and it was very obviously done when the background was hand made and the horse was CG, or when a hand drawn scene is followed by CG. That is the sort of transition I am talking about. I don't really have anything against CG per se
In TLK the CG antilope beat any Spirit CG effect in terms of style consistency.
However, I don't think that one can compare hand drawn animation and computer animation to handwriting and typing. IMHO. When handwriting/typing, the same information is conveyed, handwriting is more personal, less formally presented. Hand drawn animation produces a different finished result to CG, and the impression one receives from the media will differ more from the animation techniques than from the writing/typing. So IMO the writing/typing analogy is incorrectly used. I think that it is more appropriate when a computer is used in the colouring process rather than in the animation process. Which has been happenning for a while.

However, I don't think that one can compare hand drawn animation and computer animation to handwriting and typing. IMHO. When handwriting/typing, the same information is conveyed, handwriting is more personal, less formally presented. Hand drawn animation produces a different finished result to CG, and the impression one receives from the media will differ more from the animation techniques than from the writing/typing. So IMO the writing/typing analogy is incorrectly used. I think that it is more appropriate when a computer is used in the colouring process rather than in the animation process. Which has been happenning for a while.
Coffee is good... 

- The Dishwasher
- leader
- Сообщения: 644
- Зарегистрирован: 13 авг 2003, 01:16
- Откуда: От верблюда :)
I'd say it's a close tie!The Dishwasher писал(а):Shadowfox: you know what I mean. :P
Douglas: More boring than a horse? Um...Star Wars Episode 1!!! ZZZZ!
I thought it was nice that the horses in Spirit didn't talk. There was more freedom in animation to convey emotion.
I don't need no one else but you in my life!